Single Rubric Prescription in Homoeopathy: A Clinical and Philosophical Approach

Single Rubric Prescription in Homoeopathy: A Clinical and Philosophical Approach

Abstract 

Homoeopathic prescribing is traditionally based on totality of symptoms;  however, there are clinical situations where a single characteristic  symptom or striking keynote becomes the basis of successful prescription. This approach is known as Single Rubric Prescription. When  the symptom is clear, peculiar, uncommon, and characteristic (PQRS), it  can directly lead to the similimum. This article explores the concept,  philosophy, scope, limitations, and clinical utility of single rubric  prescribing, supported by a short clinical illustration. 

Keywords 

Single rubric prescription, keynote symptoms, PQRS, individualization,  homoeopathy 

Introduction 

Homoeopathy is based on the principle of individualization and  similitude. While classical case analysis emphasizes the totality of  symptoms, there are instances where a single characteristic symptom  stands out so prominently that it alone can guide the physician to the  remedy. This concept is recognized by stalwarts like Hahnemann, 

Boenninghausen, Kent, and Boger and is widely applied in acute as well  as certain chronic cases. 

Single rubric prescribing does not contradict classical homoeopathy;  rather, it represents refined observation and deep understanding of  characteristic symptoms. 

Concept of Single Rubric Prescription 

Single rubric prescription refers to selecting a remedy based primarily on  one striking, characteristic symptom that clearly represents the  individuality of the patient and corresponds strongly with the remedy  picture. 

This is possible when the symptom is: 

− Peculiar 

− Uncommon 

− Characteristic 

− Intense 

− Clearly expressed 

− Reliable and consistent 

Such symptoms are known as PQRS symptoms. 

Philosophical Basis 

1. Hahnemann’s View(1) 

In Organon of Medicine Aphorism 153, Hahnemann emphasizes that the  most striking, singular, uncommon, and peculiar signs and symptoms  must chiefly determine the choice of the remedy. 

“The more striking, singular, uncommon and peculiar symptoms… are  chiefly and most solely to be kept in view…” 

This clearly supports the concept of single rubric prescription. 

2. Kent’s Perspective(2) 

Kent emphasized the importance of characteristic symptoms and mental  generals. According to him, one strong mental or general symptom may 

outweigh numerous common particulars and lead directly to the  similimum. 

3. Boenninghausen’s Contribution(3) 

Boenninghausen introduced the concept of complete symptom (Location,  Sensation, Modality, Concomitant). When one complete symptom is very  intense and characteristic, it can form the sole basis of prescription. 

When is Single Rubric Prescription Applicable? 

− In acute conditions with clear characteristic symptoms − When keynote symptoms are strongly present 

− In cases with clear modalities 

− When peculiar mental symptoms are prominent 

− When pathology is common but expression is individual − In pediatric cases where expression is limited but behavior is  characteristic 

Clinical Illustration 

Case Summary:  

A 28-year-old male presented with bilateral pulsating ear pain radiating to  shoulders, worse at night and in cold weather, along with occasional thick  yellow discharge, and emotional features such as silent grief and anxiety  about future. Examination revealed no swelling but confirmed discharge.  Vitals were stable. 

Characteristic Symptom:  

Pulsating ear pain radiating towards shoulders (PQRS).  

Rubric Used:  

Ear – Pain – pulsating – extending to shoulders (Kent’s Repertory) 

Figure 1: Repertorial chart from complete repertory(4) 

Remedy:  

Natrum muriaticum was selected mainly on the basis of this single rubric. 

Treatment and Follow-up 

Natrum muriaticum 30 was prescribed initially, followed by 200 potency  in later visits. Marked improvement was noted over successive follow ups. 

Outcome Assessment (MYMOP) 

MYMOP score(5) showed clinical improvement over time. 

Result:  

The patient showed complete relief without use of antibiotics.  

Conclusion:  

This case demonstrates the clinical usefulness of simple rubric  prescription in acute conditions, also how one strong characteristic  symptom can lead directly to the similimum.

References:  

1. Hahnemann S. Organon of Medicine.  

2. Kent JT. Repertory.  

3. Boericke W. Materia Medica.  

4. Van Zandvoort, R. (2020). The Complete Repertory 2020. Zomeo. 5. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2350813/ 

Advantages of Single Rubric Prescription 

− Simpler and faster clinical decision-making 

− Useful in acute practice 

− Prevents over-analysis and confusion 

− Strengthens observation skills 

− Deepens understanding of Materia Medica 

− Enhances confidence in prescribing 

Limitations 

− Risky if symptom is not truly characteristic 

− Requires strong Materia Medica knowledge 

− Cannot be applied in vague, unclear cases 

− Needs experience and careful case-taking 

− Over-reliance may lead to partial prescribing 

Hence, this method should be used judiciously. 

Discussion 

Single rubric prescribing is not a shortcut but an advanced clinical skill. It  demands sharp observation, careful listening, and deep understanding of  remedy pictures. When applied correctly, it can produce rapid and lasting  results. Many successful prescriptions in homoeopathic practice arise  from keynote or characteristic symptoms rather than mechanical  repertorization.

Conclusion 

Single rubric prescription is a valid and valuable method within classical  homoeopathy. When the symptom is truly peculiar and characteristic, it  can act as a reliable guide to the similimum. This approach reinforces the  importance of individualization and highlights the artistic dimension of  homoeopathic practice. 

Acknowledgment 

I express gratitude to my guide Dr. Mukesh P. Khatri sir and my  Institution for support.

MYMOP2

MYMOP 2 score before treatment of case 3 = 5+5+0+3/4 = 13/4 = 3.25

MYMOP 2 score after treatment of case 3 = 1+0+0+1/4 = 2/4 = 0.5

References 

− Hahnemann S. Organon of Medicine, 6th Edition. Aphorism 153. − Kent JT. Lectures on Homoeopathic Philosophy. 

− Kent JT. Repertory of the Homoeopathic Materia Medica. − Boenninghausen C. The Therapeutic Pocket Book. 

− Allen HC. Keynotes and Characteristics of Homoeopathic  Remedies. 

− Stuart Close. The Genius of Homoeopathy. 

− https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2350813/ − Van Zandvoort, R. (2020). The Complete Repertory 2020. Zomeo. 


Guide: Dr. Mukesh P. Khatri 

M.D (Hom.) Assosciate Professor in PG Department of Homoeopathic Materia  Medica – C. D. Pachchigar College of Homoeopathic Medicine & Hospital, Surat 

About the author

Dr. Shivangi J. Upadhyay

PG scholar in Dep. of Homoepathic Materia Medica, C. D Pachchigar College of Homoeopathic Medicine and Hospital, Surat