The author critically reviews a randomised controlled trial by homoeopathy for chronic headache and an observational follow-up study of the same patient cohort. The results showed no di¡erence between homoeopathy and placebo. The author believes that these results were a false negative’ due to inadequate homoeopathic treatment, particularly relating to the duration of symptoms and handling of homoeopathic aggravations. Guidelines for future studies are proposed.
Posted By
Team Homeopathy 360
You may also like
Utility of Radium Bromatum as...
Abstract Imponderabilia means which is not weighable, i.e., the substances which have no...
Placebo and its Clinical Utility in...
Abstract Placebo is mentioned as an invaluable gift of God by master Samuel Hahnemann in his...
A Clinical Study on Utility of Acid...
ABSTRACT The research work is done on the topic, “A Clinical Study on Utility of Phosphuricum...
The Knee and its Disorders in terms...
Abstract The knee, largest of human joints, is compound joint. Despite its single cavity in man...

