The author critically reviews a randomised controlled trial by homoeopathy for chronic headache and an observational follow-up study of the same patient cohort. The results showed no di¡erence between homoeopathy and placebo. The author believes that these results were a false negative’ due to inadequate homoeopathic treatment, particularly relating to the duration of symptoms and handling of homoeopathic aggravations. Guidelines for future studies are proposed.
Posted By
Team Homeopathy 360
You may also like
Clinical Experience Of Bites And...
Dr.B.S.Suvarna The subject seems to be a simple one , but few cases which require further study...
Fascinating Short Cases Precisely...
Abstract: Case taking in homoeopathy is a living fluid-like process. The homoeopath perceives...
WHY HOMOEOPATHY AND DR. HAHNEMANN...
A lesson to learn from the history of Homoeopathy. We, almost all homoeopaths come across cases...
The Skin As A Canvas of Inner...
The Skin As A Canvas of Inner Conflicts: Homoeopathic Reflection on Eczema Abstract:...

