The author critically reviews a randomised controlled trial by homoeopathy for chronic headache and an observational follow-up study of the same patient cohort. The results showed no di¡erence between homoeopathy and placebo. The author believes that these results were a false negative’ due to inadequate homoeopathic treatment, particularly relating to the duration of symptoms and handling of homoeopathic aggravations. Guidelines for future studies are proposed.
Posted By

Team Homeopathy 360
You may also like
Opinions About Studying Non...
Ramona Jurcău, Ioana Jurcau, George Vithoulkas Introduction: Non-conventional medicine (NCM) is...
Significance of Animal Model Research...
[pdfjs-viewer url=”http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bjain.com%2Fhomeopathy360%2Fwp...
THE ORIGIN OF ℞ AND ITS PRESENT...
Author Dr Kaushik D Das Associate Professor, MHMCH,Midnapore, West Bengal Abstract: The presence...
Adjustment Disorders: A Repertorial...
Introduction Adjustment disorder is a short-term condition that occurs when a person is unable...